<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.nicic.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'Capital Punishment'</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Capital+Punishment&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'Capital Punishment'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP1 (Build: 30415.43)</generator><item><title>Supreme Court to Review Life Sentences for Juvenile Offenders</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/juvenilejustice/archive/2009/05/07/supreme-court-to-review-life-sentences-for-juvenile-offenders.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:16815</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In 2005, the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class="" href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/" target="_blank"&gt;Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;outlawed the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=900005542456" target="_blank"&gt;death&amp;nbsp;penalty for juveniles&lt;/a&gt;. This week the Court&amp;nbsp;announced it will&amp;nbsp;review whether&amp;nbsp;sentencing a juvenile to life without possibility of parole is cruel and unusual punishment. The&amp;nbsp;justices will consider &lt;a class="" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202430429419" target="_blank"&gt;two cases&amp;nbsp;from&amp;nbsp;Florida&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that challenge the constitutionality of the life sentences imposed. According to a 2008 &lt;a class="" href="http://www.hrw.org/" target="_blank"&gt;Human Rights Watch&lt;/a&gt; report, there are 2,484 juveniles that have received such a sentence, with the majority concentrated in the states of California, Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Executions Decline in U.S. for Third Straight Year</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/12/12/executions-decline-in-u-s-for-third-straight-year.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:14242</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Figures released by the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/FactSheet.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;Death Penalty Information Center&lt;/a&gt; indicate&amp;nbsp;thirty-seven (37) executions&amp;nbsp;took place&amp;nbsp;in the United States during 2008. This is the lowest number in 14 years. A partial explanation for the decrease is the informal moratorium on executions that occurred&amp;nbsp;while the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/" target="_blank"&gt;Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt; deliberated&amp;nbsp;the constitutionality of the three-drug protocol administered by almost all states that employ&amp;nbsp;lethal injection for executions. The Court rendered a decision in April&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class="" href="http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_07_5439/" target="_blank"&gt;(Baze and Bowling&amp;nbsp;v. Rees)&lt;/a&gt; upholding the method.&amp;nbsp;Also of significance is the number of persons sentenced to death (111) during 2008. This is the lowest number since 1976 when the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment. Other factors that may have&amp;nbsp;contributed to the decline&amp;nbsp;are: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;High legal and security costs associated with the death penalty;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;Pronounced&amp;nbsp;downturns in states&amp;#39; economies;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;A drop in the number of violent crimes;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Changing public sentiment regarding use of the death penalty&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>U.S. Urged to Halt Execution of Five Mexican Nationals by World Court</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/07/16/u-s-urged-to-halt-execution-of-five-mexican-nationals-by-world-court.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:10843</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a class="" href="http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/index.php?lang=en" target="_blank"&gt;International Court of Justice&lt;/a&gt;, also&amp;nbsp;known as the World Court, has requested the United States halt the execution of five Mexican nationals on death row in Texas until their cases can be further reviewed. Mexico is arguing that the U.S. is in defiance of a&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class="" href="http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/139/14639.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;2004 ruling&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;by this court that found&amp;nbsp;these and other individuals were unlawfully denied access to their country&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;consulate after their arrests, as provided by &lt;a class="" href="http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_2_1963.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;international treaty&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;In March of 2008, the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=900005560960" target="_blank"&gt;U.S. Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt; sided with Texas when it ruled that President Bush had &amp;quot;overstepped his authority when he ordered a court in the state of Texas to reopen the case of a Mexican on death row for rape and murder...&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; In the majority opinion, the Chief Justice wrote &amp;quot;the international court decision can not be forced upon states.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; It is the contention of the current administration that the World Court lacks jurisdiction in this matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court Rules on Lethal Injection Method</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/04/16/supreme-court-rules-on-lethal-injection-method.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:8882</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The&amp;nbsp;most common method used&amp;nbsp;in lethal injection executions in the United States has been&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class="" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1208342618087" target="_blank"&gt;upheld&lt;/a&gt; by the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/" target="_blank"&gt;Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt;. A constitutional challenge was made regarding&amp;nbsp;the State of Kentucky&amp;#39;s use of&amp;nbsp;the three drugs that sedate, paralyze and, finally, kill inmates.&amp;nbsp;The argument against the three-drug protocol was that if the initial drug failed to sufficiently sedate the inmate, the administration of the other two drugs could result in excruciating pain which the inmate could not express due to paralysis.This method of execution is employed by approximately three dozen states. Executions have been on hold&amp;nbsp;since September 2007 when the high court agreed to hear the Kentucky case.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Jersey Abolishes Capital Punishment</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/12/17/new-jersey-abolishes-capital-punishment.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:6445</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The State of New Jersey has become the first state in over 40 years to abolish the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22296966" target="_blank"&gt;death penalty&lt;/a&gt;. The eight men&amp;nbsp;currently on death row will have their sentences commuted to life without parole. Executions have been on hold in the U.S. pending&amp;nbsp;a decision by the Supreme Court on whether &lt;a class="" href="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/11/01/executions-by-lethal-injection-may-be-halted-until-supreme-court-rules.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;the use of lethal injections violates&amp;nbsp;the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Executions by Lethal Injection May Be Halted Until Supreme Court Rules</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/11/01/executions-by-lethal-injection-may-be-halted-until-supreme-court-rules.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:5697</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court will decide, before its scheduled July recess, the question of whether the mixture of &amp;quot;three drugs used to sedate and kill prisoners has the potential to cause pain severe enough to violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.&amp;quot; The high court agreed last month to accept a case&amp;nbsp;challenging&amp;nbsp;the lethal injection procedures of the State of Kentucky. Similar procedures are currently in place in three dozen other states. The effect may be that most, if not all executions will be halted until this ruling. &lt;a class="" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1193821423866" target="_blank"&gt;Full article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Execution of Mentally Ill Murderer Blocked in Texas</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/06/29/Execution-of-Mentally-Ill-Murderer-Blocked-in-Texas.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:3958</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><description>The execution of a man convicted&amp;nbsp;of killing his in-laws in the presence of his wife and young daughter was blocked by a divided Supreme Court on the basis of &amp;quot;a severe documented illness that is the source of gross delusions.&amp;quot; Article &lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1183021573532" target="_blank"&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>