<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.nicic.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Thinking About Corrections : Research</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Research</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP1 (Build: 30415.43)</generator><item><title>2008 National Criminal Victimization Survey</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2009/09/16/2008-national-criminal-victimization-survey.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:19762</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cv08.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;National Crime Victimization Survey&lt;/a&gt; (NCVS) reports&amp;nbsp;violent and property crime rates in 2008 were at or near their lowest levels in over three decades.&amp;nbsp;Violent&amp;nbsp;crimes&amp;nbsp;are categorized as&amp;nbsp;rape, sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault, and simple assault. &amp;quot;Property crimes&amp;nbsp;include household burglary, motor vehicle theft, and theft.&amp;quot; Personal theft, including&amp;nbsp;pocket picking and purse snatching are also included. The data is in concurrence with the &lt;a href="http://www.fbi.gov/" target="_blank"&gt;Federal Bureau of Investigation&amp;#39;s&lt;/a&gt; (FBI) &lt;a href="http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;Uniform Crime Reports&lt;/a&gt; (UCR) which also notes the continual downward trend in criminal activities over the same&amp;nbsp;time period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=19762" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Statistics/default.aspx">Statistics</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Crime+rates/default.aspx">Crime rates</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Public+Safety/default.aspx">Public Safety</category></item><item><title>New Research Reports on Reentry</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2009/06/17/new-research-reports-on-reentry.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:17503</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Conway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Followers of the literature on reentry may be interested in a new &lt;a class="" title="reentry research" href="http://community.nicic.org/forums/p/9046/17502.aspx#17502"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on the Correctional Research Roundtable forum regarding three new reports from the Urban Institute&amp;#39;s Returning Home study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=17503" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Reentry/default.aspx">Reentry</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category></item><item><title>Study Finds Majority of Arrestees in Major Metropoolitan Areas Test Positive for Illegal Drugs</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2009/05/29/study-finds-majority-of-arrestees-in-major-metropoolitan-areas-test-positive-for-illegal-drugs.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:17189</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Providing further verification of the linkage between drugs and crime, the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/news/press09/052809.html" target="_blank"&gt;White House Office of National Drug Control Policy&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;released data from the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/pdf/adam2008.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;2008 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program&lt;/a&gt; (ADAM II) revealing up to&amp;nbsp;87 percent of arrestees tested positive for illegal drugs within 48 hours of being booked into jail. The study data were compiled from a federal survey of 10 major metropolitan areas that combined drug testing and&amp;nbsp;arrestee interviews. A significant number of arrestees tested positive for more than one illegal substance. Marijuana was the most commonly detected substance with&amp;nbsp;broad regional variances in the use of&amp;nbsp;cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine. The report emphasizes&amp;nbsp;the need to&amp;nbsp;provide drug treatment as an alternative to incarceration for&amp;nbsp;non-violent offenders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=17189" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Statistics/default.aspx">Statistics</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Drug+Treatment/default.aspx">Drug Treatment</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Arrest+Data/default.aspx">Arrest Data</category></item><item><title>CSG Justice Center Releases Guide to Manage Mentally Ill in Community Corrections</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2009/03/31/csg-justice-center-releases-guide-to-manage-mentally-ill-in-community-corrections.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:16223</guid><dc:creator>llinke</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center announced today the release of a policy and practice guide for managing mentally ill offenders in the community (see attached press release).&amp;nbsp; The publication, &lt;a class="" href="http://nicic.org/Library/023634"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Improving Outcomes for People with Mental Illnesses under Community Supervision&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, was developed with support of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the National Institute of Corrections.&amp;nbsp; The guide reviews the body of recent research on community corrections supervision for people with mental illness and translates findings to help officials develop effective interventions.&amp;nbsp; Link on the PDF of the guide above, or limited printed copies of the document are available from the &lt;a class="" title="NIC Information Center" href="http://nicic.org/ResearchAssistance"&gt;NIC Information Center&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; More information regarding the mentally ill in corrections is available on the &lt;a class="" title="NIC Mentally Ill Project" href="http://www.nicic.gov/MentalIllness"&gt;NIC Projects&lt;/a&gt; pages and Justice Center&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class="" title="CSG Consensus Project" href="http://consensusproject.org/"&gt;Consensus Project&lt;/a&gt; website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16223" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><enclosure url="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/attachment/16223.ashx" length="569344" type="application/msword" /><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Mentally+ill+offenders/default.aspx">Mentally ill offenders</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Rehabilitation/default.aspx">Rehabilitation</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Evidence-Based+Practices/default.aspx">Evidence-Based Practices</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Release+Planning/default.aspx">Release Planning</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Alternatives+to+Incarceration/default.aspx">Alternatives to Incarceration</category></item><item><title>Examining the Parole Experience</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/07/31/examining-the-parole-experience.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:11573</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Conway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;New in the Urban Institute&amp;#39;s Returning Home series of reports examining the challenges of prisoner reentry is a research brief focusing on the impact of parole supervision.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a class="" title="Parole report" href="http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411744_returning_home.pdf"&gt;Returning Home on Parole&lt;/a&gt;: Former Prisoners&amp;#39; Experiences in Illinois, Ohio, and Texas includes findings regarding the usefulness of parole officers in the transition process, the relationships between parole supervision and employment and substance use, the effect of supervision on reincarceration, and who benefits more from supervision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11573" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Reentry/default.aspx">Reentry</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/parole/default.aspx">parole</category></item><item><title>What Works/Does Not Work in Reentry</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/05/28/what-works-does-not-work-in-reentry.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:9724</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Conway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;As Federal, state, and local governments look toward reentry programming as a means to improve outcomes for prisoners returning to the community, researchers are beginning to produce results regarding the effectiveness of these efforts.&amp;nbsp; The Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency has just posted an extensive review of the&amp;nbsp;Pennsylvania Department of Corrections&amp;#39; Community Orientation and Reintegration (COR) program, research done by Linda G. Smith and Denise R. Suttle of the International Association of Reentry.&amp;nbsp; Of note, the &lt;a class="" title="Reentry evaluation" href="http://www.pccd.state.pa.us/pccd/lib/pccd/stats/completedprojectdocs/final_pacorfinalreportrev4050508.pdf"&gt;outcome evaluation report&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;found &amp;quot;failures of COR Completers compared to the Control Group for almost every recidivism, employment, and substance abuse measure used in the outcome evaluation.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9724" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Reentry/default.aspx">Reentry</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/What+works/default.aspx">What works</category></item><item><title>10 Steps for Corrections Directors, Plus Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/05/22/10-steps-for-corrections-directors-plus-assessing-consistency-and-fairness-in-sentencing.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:9649</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Conway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;As a result of &amp;quot;hundreds of hours of interviews with a wide cross section of officials from 45 state corrections departments in an effort to spotlight the most effective management practices,&amp;quot; the Pew Center on the States brings us &lt;a class="" title="Pew ten steps for directors" href="http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/sentencing_and_corrections/8098PCTS_TenActions_finalLOW.pdf"&gt;Ten Steps Corrections Directors Can Take to Strengthen Performance&lt;/a&gt;, which &amp;quot;showcases innovative strategies to improve correctional systems’ performance, transparency and accountability.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Also new&amp;nbsp;on the Pew site&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp; &lt;a class="" title="Pew sentencing fairness" href="http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/sentencing_and_corrections/PEWExecutiveSummaryv10.pdf"&gt;Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing&lt;/a&gt;: A Comparative Study in Three States,&amp;quot; which it calls a &amp;quot;first-ever comprehensive, comparative evaluation of states that use sentencing guidelines,&amp;quot; looking at Minnesota, Michigan, and Virginia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9649" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Corrections+Reform/default.aspx">Corrections Reform</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Sentencing+guidelines/default.aspx">Sentencing guidelines</category></item><item><title>What Contributes to Recidivism?</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/05/01/what-contributes-to-recidivism.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:9262</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Conway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The Urban Institute has released a double whammy examining factors contributing to recidivism.&amp;nbsp; Working in collaboration with the Massachusetts Department of Corrections, the Massachusetts Recidivism Study contains three interrelated study components addressed in two new reports.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a class="" title="MA recidivism study" href="http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411657_massachusetts_recidivism.pdf"&gt;Massachusetts Recidivism Study:&lt;/a&gt; A Closer Look at Releases and Returns to Prison analyzes DOC administrative data and recidivism on a variety of statistical and demographic fronts.&amp;nbsp; Its companion report, &lt;a class="" title="Reincarcerated report" href="http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411656_mass_prisons.pdf"&gt;Reincarcerated:&lt;/a&gt; The Experiences of Men Returning to Massachusetts Prisons examines the results of parole office focus groups, as well as interviews of returning recidivists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9262" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Recidivism/default.aspx">Recidivism</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Massachusetts/default.aspx">Massachusetts</category></item><item><title>Saving Money by Expanding Drug Treatment</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/04/09/saving-money-by-expanding-drug-treatment.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:8759</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Conway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;As states look to balance burgeoning costs with public safety needs, the Urban Institute has released a timely report on the cost-benefits of expanding the availability of drug treatment among arrestees.&amp;nbsp; In &lt;a class="" title="treatment report" href="http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411645_treatment_offenders.pdf"&gt;To Treat or Not to Treat:&lt;/a&gt; Evidence on the Prospects of Expanding Treatment to Drug-Involved Offenders, the authors find that strict eligibility rules are limiting access to treatment, and they simulate several policy changes to provide guidance to policymakers on the cost-benefits of treatment expansion.&amp;nbsp; In their striking findings, &amp;quot;every policy change simulated in this study yields a cost-effective expansion of drug treatment. ... In particular, removing all eligibility restrictions and allowing access to treatment for all 1.47 million at risk arrestees would be most cost effective--producing more than $46 billion in benefits at a cost of $13.7 billion.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8759" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Cost-Benefits/default.aspx">Cost-Benefits</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Drug+Treatment/default.aspx">Drug Treatment</category></item><item><title>In the Mind's Eye</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2008/02/01/in-the-mind-s-eye.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:7231</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s been said that a picture is worth a thousand words, but, can a picture prompt a thousand urges? Through the use of&lt;a class="" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_magnetic_resonance_imaging" target="_blank"&gt; functional magnetic resonance imaging&lt;/a&gt; (fMRI), a team of researchers have found that drug-related images flashed for just 33 milliseconds&amp;nbsp;to cocaine patients activated the limbic system,&amp;nbsp;a brain network associated with reward and emotion. Dr, Nora Volkow, Director, &lt;a class="" href="http://www.drugabuse.gov/"&gt;National Institute on Drug Abuse &lt;/a&gt;(NIDA) said, &amp;quot;This is the first evidence that cues outside one&amp;#39;s awareness can trigger rapid activation of the circuits driving drug-seeking behavior.&amp;quot; For additional information on this study and its implications, click &lt;a class="" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130092113.htm" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7231" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Substance+Abuse/default.aspx">Substance Abuse</category></item><item><title>Is the Substance Abuse Treatment Programming Provided by Correctional Agencies Effective?</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/11/16/is-the-substance-abuse-treatment-programming-provided-by-correctional-agencies-effective.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:5924</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The first national survey to examine the type and quality&amp;nbsp;of substance abuse treatment programming used by correctional agencies yields some&amp;nbsp;stark&amp;nbsp;findings and&amp;nbsp;recommendations. This survey systematically looked at substance abuse treatment programming&amp;nbsp;provided for adult and juvenile offenders in prisons, jails, probation and parole, and other local community correctional agencies. The primary finding was the most frequently used substance abuse treatment programs are &amp;quot;unlikely to facilitate behavior change.&amp;quot; Among the other findings:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Substance abuse treatment services are not readily available to all offenders&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Fewer than 10% of adult offenders and approximately 20% of juvenile offenders receive the targeted treatment they require&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Staff numbers and training&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;delivery of treatment services&amp;nbsp;are inadequate&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The length of treatment provided is less than&amp;nbsp;recommended by&amp;nbsp;research literature&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the&amp;nbsp;brief on&amp;nbsp;the survey conducted by&amp;nbsp;the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.cjdats.org/ka/index.cfm" target="_blank"&gt;National Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies&lt;/a&gt; (CJ-DATS), click &lt;a class="" href="http://www.cjdats.org/content_documents/JSAT%20Printer%204-23-07.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5924" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Substance+Abuse/default.aspx">Substance Abuse</category></item><item><title>What Are the Most Dangerous Everyday Objects in Your Facility?</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/11/14/what-are-the-most-dangerous-everyday-objects-in-your-facility.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:5889</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Conway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Correctional officers in prisons and jails face an environment in which they are surrounded by potentially dangerous inmates with access to ordinary items that can be converted into weapons.&amp;nbsp; In a new NIJ-funded report, &lt;a class="" title="NIJ safety report" href="http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/220485.pdf"&gt;Improving Correctional Officer Safety&lt;/a&gt;: Reducing Inmate Weapons, a panel of practitioners from the correctional community, along with researchers from Johns Hopkins University, looks at which everyday objects pose the greatest&amp;nbsp;threat to correctional officers in the real world environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5889" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Officer+Safety/default.aspx">Officer Safety</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Contraband/default.aspx">Contraband</category></item><item><title>Does Faith Play a Role in Reducing Criminality?</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/11/07/does-faith-play-a-role-in-reducing-criminality.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:5777</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;What, if any,&amp;nbsp;is the impact of religion in promoting pro-social behaviors? This is&amp;nbsp;the question &lt;a class="" href="http://www.baylor.edu/isreligion/index.php?id=36019" target="_blank"&gt;Baylor University, Institute for Studies of Religion&lt;/a&gt; sought to answer by using standards of scholarship to examine issues of faith. Their studies&amp;nbsp;indicate that religious commitment, particularly among youth, promotes self-control and enhances protective factors regarding drug use, academic performance and&amp;nbsp;in altering the behaviors of high-risk youth. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5777" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Youthful+Offenders/default.aspx">Youthful Offenders</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Religion/default.aspx">Religion</category></item><item><title>What Constitutes A "Good" Study, Part Deux</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/10/24/what-constitutes-a-quot-good-quot-study-part-deux.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:5558</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Conway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a class="" title="research evaluation guidelines" href="http://www.ps-sp.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/CODC_2007-03_e.pdf"&gt;guidelines&lt;/a&gt; are posted!&amp;nbsp; I &lt;a class="" title="Canadian research" href="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/03/28/What-Constitutes-a-_2200_Good_2200_-Study_3F00_.aspx"&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt; wrote about Public Safety Canada&amp;#39;s work in defining guidelines for evaluating research study quality, and the detailed guidelines are now online.&amp;nbsp; While specifically addressing sexual offender treatment outcome research, parameters such as administrative control of independent variables, experimenter expectancies, sample size, attrition, and equivalence of groups should provide guidance to those assessing a much broader range of correctional research in this evidence-based age.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5558" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/What+works/default.aspx">What works</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Sex+offenders/default.aspx">Sex offenders</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Evaluation/default.aspx">Evaluation</category></item><item><title>What Factors Drive Disproportionate Minority Contact in the Juvenile Justice System?</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/2007/09/21/what-factors-drive-disproportionate-minority-contact-in-the-juvenile-justice-system.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:5127</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a class="" href="http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/219743.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; funded by the &lt;a class="" href="http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/" target="_blank"&gt;Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;highlights a delinquency study from three (3) metropolitan areas&amp;nbsp;that examines disproportionate minority contact and the&amp;nbsp;impact it may have on&amp;nbsp;decision making by police and courts. The &lt;a class="" href="http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/programs/ProgSummary.asp?pi=19&amp;amp;" target="_blank"&gt;Program of Research on the Causes and Correlates of Delinquency&lt;/a&gt; produced this report in its ongoing mission to &amp;quot;improve the understanding of serious delinquency, violence, and drug use by examining how youth develop within the context of family, school, peers, and community.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5127" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/corrections_headlines/archive/tags/Juvenile+offenders/default.aspx">Juvenile offenders</category></item></channel></rss>