<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.nicic.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Community Corrections for Professionals : Evidence-Based Practices</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Evidence-Based+Practices/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Evidence-Based Practices</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP1 (Build: 30415.43)</generator><item><title>Standardizing Parole Violation Sanctions</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/2009/06/26/standardizing-parole-violation-sanctions.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:17684</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The economic realities of&amp;nbsp;many state budgets has prompted a renewed examination of how corrections systems do business. One of the&amp;nbsp;areas of concern&amp;nbsp;has&amp;nbsp;been the number&amp;nbsp;of costly and time-consuming parole violation hearings that often result&amp;nbsp;in the &lt;a class="" href="http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/ppus07st.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;re-incarceration of&amp;nbsp;parolees&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(Table 6).&amp;nbsp;Is&amp;nbsp;there a methodology parole agencies can utilize to address parole violations and the accompanying sanctions in a&amp;nbsp;fairer and more proportionate manner? In an attempt to answer this question, two states (&lt;a class="" href="http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Parole/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;California&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a class="" href="http://www.drc.ohio.gov/web/apa.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Ohio&lt;/a&gt;) have employed&amp;nbsp;standardized tools&amp;nbsp;that provide a grid of graduated sanctions to assist in parole violation decision making.&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a class="" href="http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/226873.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;Standardizing Parole Violation Sanctions&lt;/a&gt;, a&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a class="" href="http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/journals/welcome.htm" target="_blank"&gt;National Institute of Justice Journal&lt;/a&gt; report highlights both states and the possible implications the use of standardized tools may have on a national basis. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A full report on the impact of Ohio&amp;#39;s Progressive Sanction Grid is available &lt;a class="" href="http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/224317.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Information on&amp;nbsp;California&amp;#39;s Parole Violation Decision Making Instrument (PVDMI) may be found&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class="" href="http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/PVDMI/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=17684" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Violations/default.aspx">Violations</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Revocations/default.aspx">Revocations</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Statistics/default.aspx">Statistics</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Evidence-Based+Practices/default.aspx">Evidence-Based Practices</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Parole/default.aspx">Parole</category></item><item><title>Evidence-Based Practices Tool Kit for Community Corrections</title><link>http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/2008/03/13/evidence-based-practices-tool-kit-for-community-corrections.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">26cc0436-63b6-4ef3-9d43-d8006bc9b9ca:8006</guid><dc:creator>CC Pro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The term &lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;evidence-based&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt; is used widely in describing effective interventions&amp;nbsp;in fields ranging from medicine to corrections. But what is the definition of and the&amp;nbsp;guiding principles that indicate whether individuals and agencies are&amp;nbsp;engaging in&amp;nbsp;proper decision-making for the treatment and supervision of their clients? The &lt;a class="" href="http://www.drc.state.oh.us/" target="_blank"&gt;Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="" href="http://www.drc.state.oh.us/web/iej.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Ohio Institute on Correctional Best Practices, Institute for Excellence in Justice&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;has provided a clear and concise best practices tool kit for community-based corrections professionals that answers these and other questions. This report also highlights the polices and practices of&amp;nbsp;jurisdictions that have adopted an evidence-based model for operations and supervision. Report &lt;a class="" href="http://www.drc.state.oh.us/web/iej_files/EvidenceBasedPracticesInCommunityCorrections.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.nicic.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8006" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://community.nicic.org/blogs/community_corrections/archive/tags/Evidence-Based+Practices/default.aspx">Evidence-Based Practices</category></item></channel></rss>